| |
Publications > Cahiers (English)> N° 49, 4th term 1998 |
|
COMPTES RENDUS DE LECTURE G. JÉGOUZO, J.-L.
BRANGEON et B. ROZE, Richesse et pauvreté en agriculture, par Effects of nitrogen input and nitrogen surplus taxes in Dutch agriculture John HELMING (Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI-DLO), Burgemeester Patijnlaan 19, P.O. Box 29703, NL-2502 LS The Hague, The Netherlands. e-mail : j.f.m.helming@lei.dlo.nl ) In : Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurale, n° 49, 1998, pp 5-31 Summary - In this
paper a partial equilibrium, regionalised, comparative static, mathematical
programming model of the Dutch agricultural sector is developed to analyse
the effects of taxes on nitrogen input use and nitrogen surpluses in Dutch
agriculture. The focus of this paper is on effects of taxes on nitrogen
surpluses at the soil level, gross margin from agriculture, land use and
livestock composition. Strong and weak points of the model are discussed.
Strong points are its consistency at regional, national and sector level
and the possibility to model manure flows and markets for intermediates
in detail. Weak points are the level of aggregation and the restricted
number of substitution possibilities at the activity level. As a result
elasticities of input demand are quite low. Key-words : feed concentrates, mineral fertilisers, nitrogen surpluses, markets, sector.
Vers une redéfinition du rôle de l'assurance agricole dans la gestion
des risques sur récoltes Olivier MAHUL (INRA, Station déconomie et sociologie rurales, rue Adolphe Bobierre, CS 61103, 35011 Rennes cedex. e-mail : mahul@roazhon.inra.fr ) In : Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurale, n° 49, 1998, pp 33-58 Summary - Farmers
make their production decisions in an environment characterized by multiple
uncertainty. Protective activities do not always provide an efficient
protection against weather-related causes of loss. Agricultural revenues
are all the more exposed to uncertain losses as the specialization of
agricultural production has reduced the opportunities of risk pooling.
Insurance contributes to transferring these risks through individuals
who are best to bear them. Nevertheless, historical experience strongly
suggests that markets for crop insurance would fail without government
financial support, which is either direct by creating an indemnification
fund for agricultural disasters like in France or indirect by reinsuring
private companies like in the United States. In recent years, numerous
studies have showed that informational asymmetries and systemic risk are
the main obstacles to the development of an independent crop insurance
industry. In addition, the emergence of new sources of risks, like output
price uncertainty, may contribute to increasing the variability of agricultural
revenues. Key-words : agricultural disasters, crop insurance, incomplete markets, market failure, systemic risk. Use of income, and financial behaviour in agricultural firms. An empirical analysis Svend RASMUSSEN (Department of Economics and Natural Resources, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, KVL, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Copenhagen, Denmark. e-mail: Svend.Rasmussen@flec.kvl.dk ) In : Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurale, n° 49, 1998, pp 59-84 Summary - This paper analyses financial behaviour in Danish agriculture during the period 1980-1993. The main objective has been to empirically analyse how changes in income and credit reserves have influenced financial decisions. Hypotheses were established based on the theoretical work by Barry, Baker and Sanint. An econometric model based on panel data (farm accounts) was estimated. The results show that private consumption, repayment of loans, and investments in financial assets and real assets change as expected when equity and income change. The changes take place both within the same year and the following year. Key-words : econometric model, income changes, liquidity, equity, credit reserves, investment, consumption. Consequences for the single market of the implementation of special VAT regimes for agriculture in the European Union José A. GÓMEZ-LIMÓN*,
Julio BERBEL ** (* Department of Agricultural Economics, ETSIIAA,
University of Valladolid, Avda. de Madrid, 57, 34071 PALENCIA (Spain).
e-mail: limon@iaf.uva.es
** Department of Agricultural Economics, ETSIAM, University of
Cordoba, P.O. Box 3048, In : Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurale, n° 49, 1998, pp 85-108 Summary - The application of VAT to agriculture varies in the member countries of the European Union (EU). Most countries accept a special regime for small and medium-sized holdings in the agricultural sector in order to avoid the burden of record-keeping involved in VAT administration. The present paper analyses the VAT Special Regimes for Agriculture of EU members and proposes an indicator to compare the degree of neutrality of VAT regimes between EU Member States, from both national farm level and farm typology level points of view. Our conclusions are that there are significant differences in tax pressure between countries, with the result that in some of them agricultural producers are taxed in excess, while others are subsidized by the implementation of the agricultural VAT regime. A serious effort should be made to harmonize members tax policies in order to allow fairer competition throughout the European Single Market. Key-words : VAT, fiscal policy, single market, agricultural markets. |
| Droits
et devoirs des utilisateurs -
copyright INRA 1999-2009 - INRA -SAE2 (tous droits
réservés) - Date de création : février 2005 -
Réalisation : Claire Tarot Direction de la publication : Bertrand Schmitt - webmaster - contact - |